Go the CHDC site for more details on how this piece of luck came about:
As I’ve said again and again: don’t take my word for it. Do the research yourself. So many Quebeckers are vehemently against horse slaughter but they haven’t got the time to do the research. So here are a few facts (and, all of these have already been listed under my Primers on Horse Slaughter right here on my blog. If the link doesn’t work, go to My Categories under Primers for Horse Slaughter).Read More
Tell the truth and shame the devil! Does anyone remember that old chestnut? That’s exactly what Sonja Meadows does in the attached video. The video (also on Youtube) was produced by Animals-Angels USA and was intended for general audiences, although some viewers have already alerted me that it is, in fact, disturbing…towards the end, just a little bit, not very but enough to make one cringe, etc. Les images sont peu perturbantes mais les ames sensibles sont averties. Remember that, according to the USDA’s own figures, nearly 92 per cent of horses sent to Canada for slaughter are young and healthy. What a waste when these horses could be recycled into the live horse industry–a vibrant and thriving industry here in Quebec…Read More
It’s not often I encounter someone whose IQ is so low that I consider their existence to be a waste of space. My definition of stupidity is: ”Stupidity is the unwillingness to learn” because I didn’t believe in “stupidity” per se. In this particular case, I’d also add one of my favourite quotes by the poet John Donne: ”No man is an island…ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.” I’ll explain shortly why that last quote is so relevant to this rant by a livestock owner who is only at the top of the food chain by accident of birth or, um species, and certainly not for any other saving grace. Note that the emotional, almost hysterical, tone adopted by this, um, writer is exactly what the pro slaughterers claim is what horse advocates indulge in…reminiscent of Anita Bryant or Pa Kettle (well, to be fair, Pa was thick but kind-hearted). Hmm…read on and decide for yourself. Then go on to read two responses, one from another farmer, and one from Animal Advocates of Michigan.
In answer to a politely written Letter to the Editor of farmanddairy.com located in Salem, Ohio, he writes:Read More
The purpose of Section 33 of the Meat Inspection Act was to prevent the mixing of horsemeat with other meats rendered, prepared, packaged, labelled and sold to the consumer market. By repealing this section of the Act, Canada has jeopardized the food safety of its own citizens (see previous post called “Alert! Horse Apartheid”). This is a life-altering, backwards step by the CFIA which herein caters only to abattoir owners who don’t want to follow country-wide food safety regulations, and want to butcher horses in their own way. (For those of who read my book, Ground Manners, you’ll recall the part about “l’abattage au bout de la pelle” [slaughter at the end of a backhoe shovel]. This is where Quebec is headed by pandering to an industry which, rather than be left to its own devices, should, at all times, be monitored for food safety.)
Section 33 repealed as of October 2011 in the Meat Inspection Act of 1990 originally read thusly:
33. (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), during the time a food animal other than an equine animal is slaughtered at a registered establishment, a carcass of a food animal other than an equine animal is dressed at a registered establishment or a meat product derived from a food animal other than an equine animal is processed, packaged or labelled in a registered establishment, the registered establishment shall not at the same time contain a meat product derived from an equine animal and shall not thereafter be used for the slaughtering of an equine animal, the dressing of the carcass of an equine animal or the processing, packaging or labelling of a meat product derived from an equine animal unless
(a) all meat products derived from a food animal other than an equine animal have been removed from the registered establishment;
(b) the registered establishment has facilities that are suitable for handling equine animals and for the slaughtering of equine animals; and
(c) an inspector has certified that the registered establishment meets the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b).
(2) The meat products required by paragraph (1)(a) to be removed from a registered establishment may be kept in the registered establishment if they are locked in a separate room under the control of an inspector.
(3) Where a meat product derived from an equine animal is processed in a registered establishment, a meat product derived from a food animal other than an equine animal may, for the purpose of being combined with the meat product of an equine animal, be kept in the registered establishment.
For those who haven’t read the text of why Section 33 and other sections were repealed (see link in prior post), the reason the government did this was to accommodate small business owners of abattoirs who cannot afford to meet the requirements of the CFIA’s policies and procedures. (Well then…why have a CFIA at all?)Read More
A dear friend just sent this to me: Amendments (as of Nov 9/11) made to the Meat Inspection Act of 1990 include repealing Section 33 which heretofore segregated the rendering of horsemeat from the rendering of other animal meat. If this is true, then the reason horsemeat had originally been kept separate will return: it will accidentally or by human error become mixed in with other meat products sold to consumers. Go here